Here’s another interesting article, via Donald. It’s from the New York Times and is about a movement in the States whereby people are cutting down what they own to 100 items. So, out go the juicer and the toastie maker and in comes endless debates as to what constitutes ‘1 item’? A pair of socks? Cutlery? Book collection?
Either way, it would be an interesting exercise to undertake. Presumably, you’d start by keeping everything that you’d use every day? Every week? Then what? But, by going through the process, you’re going to realise how much stuff you really need and more importantly, how much you don’t.
In this way, it would be a little like camping as you quickly understand you can only take what you can carry and you try and extend the number of uses for the same thing.
Further, what this does is that it frames the debate about consumerism as a personal challenge you can discuss and compare with others undergoing the same task. You can see what your 100 items are and compare them to others and debate the relative merits of different items, and the process of ‘One in, one out’ when you want to buy something new.
Perhaps most importantly, it turns the dry, negative ”Buy less stuff’ message into a game which you pit yourself against yourself and against others. It makes you value what you’ve got more rather than feeling guilty about buying anything at all. Good stuff indeed.